Sunday, December 28, 2014

Black Gold

A somewhat unexpected sell off in oil price is nevertheless a welcoming news.

Most of the oil and gas exploration companies are selling at discount due to the sell off in crude oil. The stagnant crude oil prices won't last as production shut in already happening and companies are cutting capital expenditure.

Exclusive: New U.S. oil and gas well November permits tumble nearly 40 percent

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/02/us-usa-oil-permits-idUSKCN0JG2C120141202
Continental Resources Announces Revised 2015 Capital Budget And Guidance

Energy firms slash spending on drilling as crude’s decline accelerates


Since gas is price inelastic, the dropping prices won't cause any uptick in demand in the short run. So to close the gap between the excess supply and demand - Supply would have to be reduce. And most of U.S. shale oil productions are not profitable at the current WTI price of $55 a barrel. Prices probably won't recover until the excess inventory work itself out in summer driving season and the supply reduced in 2015. This will leave a good 6 months of lower energy and stock price. An excellent "buyers" market I must say since production won't recover until WTI reaches back to $80 a barrel. 

So I will be paying close attention to inventory numbers from EIA week by week.

I don't buy the slow demand from Europe/Asia theory. World Oil Consumption, a factor of demand is still trending up

Also since oil is priced in US Dollar. The strength of the dollar is most definitely contributing to the sell off. 

The problem from lower oil prices is the fact that wealth is now being transferred from net oil producing countries to net oil consumption countries. Hence, the Russian economy is getting hit particularly hard (as a net oil exporter). We should pay close attention to the possible contagion effects from these oil producing countries possibly defaulting in 2015 (ei: Venezuela/Russia). This will cause more geographic instability in these regions of the world (bad for supply but also bad for GDP growth).


OPEC is usually the swing producer - meaning they are willing to cut production to support prices. But it seems to be no longer the case this time around. Perhaps there alternative political motive behind the action. Or do they simply do it because they can?


No worries, you can always depend on America on the demand side of the equation:

So no doubt in my mind that oil price will rebound, it just the matter of time since shale oil is unprofitable to produce and drill below $70-80 a barrel. There is very little chance oil stay at the current level given the steady rise in consumption. The overstock of oil is relatively short term (1-2 year).

How long does a typical oil down cycle last:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2757505-how-long-does-a-typical-oil-downcycle-last




About that GDP "revision"

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/12/obama_administration_tweaked_the_gdp_data_.html

Interesting.

Thursday, May 1, 2014

AT&T - Dividend Champ with Hidden Value

With Netflix signing two deals recent - one with Comcast and the other with Verizon, I can't help but think this is going to be the future of internet. The information highway now can charge tolls two ways! The basic business of any telecommunication provider is a subscription based business with consumer paying a fee every month. The challenge is that the landline market is quite saturated, and the high-growth wireless business is getting very competitive. 

So there is almost zero chance for any cable/telecoms to get out of low single digit growth rate.

The Netflix deals changed everything.

Now service providers such as Netflix is paying to get on the internet express lane. This can be first of many. 

Service providers and app developers now might need to pay to get speedier connections to the consumers. And the longer AT&T hold out on dealing with Netflix - the more Netflix is going to fork up to ensure AT&T broadband customers are getting the best experience. I can be wrong but that type of deal just made any companies providing internet connections a lot more lucrative. 

And let's not forget the same can happen with apps and wireless data plan:


This can only mean extra revenue for internet service providers. They are essentially double dipping on both end. The ISPs can do this because they have leverage - leverage created by years of consolidation and limited competition. Look what happened to the telecom industry in the past decade. We have so limited choices here in the U.S. because of mergers and acquisitions. We have four major wireless providers to choose from and if Sprint - Tmobile deal get approved - that will limit it to only three! As for at-home internet connection, most people only have two choices - their local telecom or their local cable company. 

Unfortunately, limited competition works against the consumers. The scale is now tipped into the hands of a few who can bring you on-line. Advertisers and app developers will fight for the screen time on people smartphone - and who's standing between them and the consumers?

Hence, I believe AT&T or any telcos and cable company that has substantial customer base stand to benefit from this trend.

AT&T just happens to offer a juicier 5%+ dividends. Couple that with the low rates banks are offering to park your cash. It's a no brainer.


Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Investment Outlook 2014

We are well into the 2nd quarter of 2014 and I am just publishing my outlook for the year. Better late than never right?

I am bullish on the U.S. Economy:
+ Employment is steady and improving
+ Households debts are winding down
+ Housing prices recovered (individual wealth+)
+ Corporate balance sheets are well cushioned
+ Low interest rate
+ Entrepreneurial fostering environment (ability to foster innovations such as Tesla/Facebook/Twitter...etc)

Not so bullish case against the U.S. Economy:
- QE winding down - the low rates environment might soon be gone
- Corporations are hoarding cash and not spending on capital expenditure
- Despite positive GDP growth and tax receipts, there is still a outsize Federal budget deficit ($400 billions+)
- Slower earning growth

Even I am bullish on the U.S. economy, I feel like most assets are fairly priced. Buying bonds here would be silly if economy continue to growth, which will lead to inflation. Inflation = rates hike. Rates hike = depress bond prices.

The stock market is fairly priced at a P/E of 16-17. But, it is a better hedge against inflation as long as 10 year treasury rate is under 5%.

Real Estate is also fairly priced depending on the location. Again, this is an asset that is rate sensitive. However, you can use quite the leverage when investing in rental properties. I personally do not like the illiquid aspect of real estate, neither do I have much to put down for down payment in my area (NYC).

Gold - I can't value gold. This thing does not have intrinsic value. It does not produce cash flows. Your guess is as good as mine.

Commodities - I like oil in general just because it will take a massive build out of infrastructure (which takes time) to replace the current energy needs. And it has become tougher to find and drill oil the conventional way. The mega oil companies replacement reserve rate is barely 100% (they can barely replace the current outgoing production). The only bright side on the supply side is fracking and horizontal drilling in couple of good oil patches within the U.S. But those wells deplete on a much faster rate than convention well. Oil is very finite and widely demanded. It is also extremely sensitive to political risk around the world. I'm very bullish on oil.

In a not so quick conclusion, the stock market, even fairly value, make a decent case for investment. If the economy does well and inflation picks up, corporations can pass through pricing down the supply chain. If the economy does not do well, which will encourage the Federal Reserve to continue their current accommodating programs - which is also good for stock. It's almost a win-win here.


Disclosure: I'm long SU, CHK, DB, INTC

CYA legal disclaimer:

Not Investment Advice or an Offer
This information is intended to assist investors. The information does not constitute investment advice or an offer to invest or to provide management services and is subject to correction, completion and amendment without notice. Any such offer, if made, will only be made by means of a confidential prospectus or offering memorandum or management agreement. It it not our intention to state, indicate or imply in any manner that current or past results, when stated, are indicative of future results or expectations. A prospective investor should consult with its own investment, accounting, legal and tax advisers to evaluate independently the risks, consequences and suitability of that investment.
Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Site may contain statements, estimates or projections that constitute “forward-looking statements” as defined under U.S. federal and other jurisdictions securities laws. Any such forward looking statements are inherently speculative and are based on currently available information, operating plans and projections about future events and trends. As such, they are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. Actual results and performance may be significantly different from historical experience and our present expectations or projections. This website undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

North America - World's Energy Powerhouse

I'm going to keep this post short and concise. North America is on the way to become a NET supplier of energy source to the world even being the biggest consumer(s).

Let's start off with a map of today's energy picture:


Continue onto the increase in production in Canada, U.S. and Mexico:

U.S. Shale Gas:


"In its April 2009 report, "Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer," the US Department of Energy stated that at the US natural gas production rates for 2007 of about 19.3 Tcf, the current recoverable resource estimate provides enough natural gas to supply the US for the next 90 years. Separate estimates of the shale gas resource extend this supply to 116 years. Production of shale gas is expected to increase from a 2007 US total of 1.4 Tcf to 4.8 Tcf in 2020. The DOE report states that shale gas production potential of 3 to 4 Tcf per year may be sustainable for decades. The INGAA report stated that to achieve the forecast results, industry must have land access for drilling, a reasonable permitting process and adequate prices and demand for natural gas."


 "In November 2013, the US Energy Information Administration projected that Bakken production in North Dakota and Montana would exceed one million barrels per day in December 2013.[12] As a result of the Bakken, North Dakota as of 2013 is the second oil-producing state in the US, behind only Texas.[13]
Bakken production has also increased in Canada, although to a lesser degree than in the US, since the 2004 discovery of the Viewfield Oil Field in Saskatchewan. The same techniques of horizontal drilling and multi-stage massive hydraulic fracturing are used. In December 2012, 2,357 Bakken wells in Saskatchewan produced a record high of 71,000 barrels of oil per day.[14] The Bakken Formation also produces in Manitoba, but the yield is small, averaging less than 2,000 barrels per day in 2012.[15]"

Canada's Oil Sands:
"Most of the oil sands of Canada are located in three major deposits in northern Alberta. These are the Athabasca-Wabiskaw oil sands of north northeastern Alberta, the Cold Lake deposits of east northeastern Alberta, and the Peace River deposits of northwestern Alberta. Between them, they cover over 140,000 square kilometres (54,000 sq mi)—an area larger than England—and hold proven reserves of 1.75 trillion barrels (280×109 m3) of bitumen in place. About 10% of this, or 173 billion barrels (27.5×109 m3), is estimated by the government of Alberta to be recoverable at current prices, using current technology, which amounts to 97% of Canadian oil reserves and 75% of total North American petroleum reserves."

Mexico Opening For Oil Investment Due to Troubles with Under-investment in state own PEMEX:

Thoughts from the Russians, the World Largest Energy Producer (ex-OPEC):

China's Needs For LNG:

OECD vs Non-OECD Oil Demand:

Warren Buffet Piling on Exxon/Suncor:
Suncor is the world's largest producer of bitumen, and owns and operates an oil sands upgrading plant near Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada. Originally developed by Great Canadian Oil Sands, a majority-owned subsidiary of Sun Oil, it is now wholly owned by the independent Suncor. It was the first commercial development on the Athabasca oil sands, although small, earlier projects like that at Bitumount also played a role in development. The company also produces conventional oilheavy crude oil, and natural gas.[10]
Imperial Oil Ltd. (French: L'ImpĂ©riale) (TSXIMONYSE MKTIMO) is a Canadian Petroleum company.[2] It is Canada's second-biggest integrated oil company.[3] Exxon Mobil Corp. had a 69.6 percent ownership stake in the company as of December 31, 2012.[2] It is a significant producer of crude oil and natural gas, Canada’s major petroleum refiner, a key petrochemical producer and a national marketer with coast-to-coast supply and retail networks.[2] Its retail operations include Esso-brand service stations and On the Run/MarchĂ© Express and Tiger Express-brand convenience stores.[2][5] It is also known for its holdings in theAlberta Oil Sands.[3] Imperial owns 25 percent of Syncrude, which is one of the world’s largest oil sands operations.[2]

Bottom Line: North America will become an energy production powerhouse. Companies with large energy reserve and operational efficiency to get oil/gas out of the ground will benefit the most from this shift. Will be back with more details.